Journalism Shamed.

It was spring of 2005 when a suave looking man entered my classroom and started discussing ethics and media law. A lawyer by profession, his task was to impress upon young students, soon to be journalists, the importance of ethics and legalities while dealing with sticky situations.

Years later at another journalism school, my professor asked a question in the class, “If a person was murdered and his family was grieving and your editor told you to go to his house and ask for their reaction, would you do it?” Most of the students said, “Yes.” “What if the family said they didn’t want to speak to the media, would you ring the doorbell again?” Hesitant, some murmured a yes. Most said, “No.” “What if your editor really pressurized you and asked you to try again?” Only one hand rose in the class and a lone voice said, “Yes, I’ll try again.” And thus started a debate on how far will you go to get your story.

A good journalist will go any lengths to get a good story, an editor would say. But it all depends on what is a good story. In my opinion, one needs to weigh if it will do public good, hold organizations or people accountable for wrong doing or if the reason is to sell a commercially viable story.

So when a teenage girl was murdered and her phone was not only hacked by so called journalists, when the voicemail box became full, they even had the audacity to delete some messages, so space could be made for new ones full of anguish. So a juicy story could be filed the next day? So the newspaper would have an exclusive? So that it would sell more?

And no, the newspaper did not just stop here. Authors, actors and politicians were subjected to the same. As The Guardian says:

Journalists hacked phones and people’s email accounts, undertook surveillance at close and long range, sowed suspicion among friends and within families, induced people to become informants, threatened, blackmailed and bullied, especially those who stood up to them, and published rumours and lies to blacken people’s reputations.

Journalism lost that day. An untamed, intangible, malicious beast won instead. A beast in the form of black words on white paper.

Where in the world is it acceptable for journalists to do this just for a juicy tabloid story? And what about the work culture of such an organization which allegedly encouraged journalists to follow such practices. And whose editor and owners sat in the parliament saying they were unaware of these happenings in their backyard.

But the entire chain of events throw up a question – much like the chicken and eggs situation. Do newspapers stoop to such levels because this is what people will read and this sells? Or because the newspapers sell this, so the people will buy it. Who sets the agenda – the demand from the people or the newspaper sales? Have we moved away from a time when news was supposed to be the primary agenda setting entity? The Huffington Post blames the masses as much as it blames those journalists.

However, as the cliché goes, every cloud has a silver lining. The story has unfolded because a journalist broke this story. A newspaper published this. The people read it. A public opinion was formed. A legal recourse is underway. The beast, at last it seems, is going to be tamed. But for how long? There have been whispers that other tabloids have indulged in similar practices with vociferous denials from them. Maybe we should brace for another round of investigations and revelations.

But journalistic enquiry is testament to the fact that the system still works. That journalism might just win at the end of the day. That there is still hope that wrong will be righted and rigorous policies formulated so that journalism will not be shamed again.



Filed under Media

4 responses to “Journalism Shamed.

  1. I would blame the masses and evolution of our society. The ever increasing voyeuristic instincts of our society lead us to such a mess. The ever increasing popularity of shows like Big Boss in India is a prime indicator of where we are heading. I was quite amazed to learn that these tabloids make more business in UK than regular newspapers. Then I guess, the supply is only because of demand.

  2. Hi Neha,
    It is tough being a journalist. I remember, back when i was interning with a top daily, the first front page i got was a story about a senior citizen being murdered in cold blood. People congratulated me saying they expected to see many more front pages from me. I was asking myself the night before the paper went to print, “seriously, is this how i wanted to enter the front page?” I wasn’t on cloud nine, considering i had a page 1 story because it was about death. later on in the crime beat came many occassions where in i had to talk to relatives of dead people, etc. Although it made me feel miserable that i was feeding off someone else’s misery to get my story, i realised that this is a job – and if i am in this field, i had better swallow my emotions and get on with the story. Towards the end of my internship, there came another such case wherein i was asked to talk to the family of a youngster who had just jumped off her building’s terrace. Against my wishes i went to her building, i even went on the floor, but just before i was about to ring the bell, i donno what happened, i just retraced my steps and decided, i am not going to do this.
    I still am in the media field, but there are some things i will just not do to get a story. Yeah, it is all very good to say that this is your job, how can you get emotional about it? But then, i have certain principles and I would rather respect them than run after a story hacking things that are in complete contrast with things that i believe in. You always have a choice.
    What happened at NOTW was pathetic and i cannot even imagine how employees could go that far for a story. I know tabloids are always in competition to get such stories, but cmon did no one who was doing that story have a conscience. There are so many better stories to chase than tapping a dead girls answering machine. Ultimately it all depends on the writer of the story, whether to go with company policy or follow their heart and have the courage to say no.
    take care

    PS: Btw i saw a Chevrolet ad on TV the other day, where the name of the person giving her feedback on the car reads – ‘Neha Gupta, Journalist’:P was wondering if that was you;)

  3. LO,
    I agree. Just yesterday some of them were arrested. Quite shameful.

  4. TD,
    My apologies for disappearing. I have been through the same dilemma. Sometimes after an accident or some incident, the newsroom just waits for the body count to go up so they can start reporting. Though sometimes we do redeem ourselves with stories that mean something. Kya kare, such is our profession.
    P.S: The Chevvy ad girl is not me. And are you sure that’s my surname? 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s